Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Funa Kozaki vs Tzeng Mu-Jie Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kozaki vs Mu-Jie analysis and find out who is favored!
Funa Kozaki vs Tzeng Mu-Jie Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kozaki 0 - 0 Mu-Jie
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kozaki has won 44.56% of points on their second serve, while Mu-Jie has won 38.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kozaki, in recent form, has won 53.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mu-Jie has won 58.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.15% and 34.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kozaki has saved 50.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mu-Jie has saved 36.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kozaki has won 55.26% of matches played (W/L 21/ 17), with Mu-Jie winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kozaki has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Mu-Jie has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Kozaki has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 10/ 9), where as Mu-Jie has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kozaki has played against opponents with an average rank of 193.97 while Mu-Jie has played against players with an average rank of 252.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kozaki has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mu-Jie has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kozaki has converted 57.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mu-Jie has converted 35.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
666
Rank
592
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
48% (93-102)
Career Total W/L
50% (1-1)
53% (8-7)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Funa Kozaki vs Tzeng Mu-Jie For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kozaki VS Mu-Jie
Sportsbook
Offer
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Funa Kozaki | Tzeng Mu-Jie |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (8/7) | 50% (1/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (19/16) | 50% (2/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (156/152) | 47% (17/19) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 13 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:12 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 195.8 | 252.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (562/955) | 70% (73/104) |
| 1st Serve W% | 56% (316/562) | 63% (46/73) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (169/393) | 39% (12/31) |
| BPs Won% Total | 59% (67/114) | 35% (6/17) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (450/942) | 44% (59/135) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (8/15) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Funa Kozaki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mio Mushika
Player
Funa Kozaki
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Funa Kozaki
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Funa Kozaki
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
1
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
52%
(
45 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Funa Kozaki
Player
Remika Ohashi
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
81%
(
76 of
94)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
54%
(
51 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
55 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Funa Kozaki
Player
Nana Kawagishi
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoria Morvayova
Player
Funa Kozaki
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(1) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Funa Kozaki
Player
Yuka Hosoki
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anri Nagata
Player
Funa Kozaki
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ho Ching Wu
Player
Funa Kozaki
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Funa Kozaki
Player
Rio Maeda
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
53%
(
29 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tzeng Mu-Jie Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Tzeng Mu-Jie
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tzeng Mu-Jie
Player
Gaeul Jang
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kozaki Vs Mu-Jie Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kozaki are available here and Mu-Jie photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
